|
本帖最后由 gabriellm 于 2017-5-18 14:29 编辑
Have you seen in situ, physically, the Stamboul maxicard? Maybe a photographical montage to trick you. Some person has seen it? Some person has bought it? Only it is a urban legend, nobody has really seen it.
About Lion of Belfort, one card have dots that other card has not. Is it the same postcard? I do not think.
And he has obtained 80 points, Grand Vermeil. Jury was composed by Nicos Rangos, Anny Boyard, Rosario D′Agata and Eduardo Escalada, specialists in forgeries. I have heard that only Turkey maxicards were doubful, and to exhibit again them they would need a certificate. They have not found irregularities in your ¿20? maxicards that you told were fake.
By the way, I have heard that you analyzed the italian maxicards (that you have unpaid, stolen) with chemical proccess (presumibly forgery ). I would like see the report, as well to my friend, I am sure that rest of collector as well like see it. But I do not understand what do you want say, after an analysis, "tested chemically and found to be fake (presumably modern ink not 1930s ink)". Could you show the report ? So my friend could visit to the person who sold them in Rome.
你有没有在现场看到身体上的Stamboul maxicard?也许一个照片蒙太奇欺骗你。有人看过吗?有人买了吗?只有这是一个城市的传说,没有人真的看到它
关于贝尔福的狮子,一张牌有点其他牌还没有。这是明信片吗?我不这样认为。
而且他已经获得了80分,Grand Vermeil。陪审团由Nicos Rangos,Anny Boyard,Rosario D'Agata和Eduardo Escalada,伪造专家组成。我听说只有土耳其的最高法院才是双重的,再次表明他们需要一个证书。他们没有发现你的呃20的违规行为?你告诉的最高法院是假的。
顺便说一句,我听说你用化学处理(大概伪造:D)分析了意大利最高标准(你没有付钱,被盗)。我想看到报告,以及我的朋友,我相信收藏家的其他人也喜欢看到它。但我不明白你要说什么,经过分析,“化学测试,发现是假的(大概是现代墨水不是20世纪30年代墨水)”。你能报告吗?所以我的朋友可以去罗马出售他们的人。 |
|